Synopsis : While most of the nations consider US action in Venezuela as violation of international law, US considers it as an action for protecting US national interests . According to USA , the risk to US national security comes from the influence of extra-Western-hemisphere actors ( mainly China ) present in Venezuela as well as in most of the South American countries . US production of oil in 2024 was around 22 million barrels per day with consumption slightly below production and US does not really need oil from Venezuela . While Venezuela is not a producer of cocaine , it is a transhipment point for transport to USA. Maduro is charged with narco-terrorism in US court . USA is very much concerned about the Chinese presence in South America through its BRI projects and increasing export of goods. This is perceived as a national threat for USA. US has been trying to promote its free market capitalism and neo-liberalism in South American countries without success. US is now trying to change its strategy towards South American countries with a new plan with the basic intension of reducing Chinese influence in these countries in a manner adapted to each country . The ultimate US objective is to protect its national interests from probable threats from China . This is important because USA could be an indirect ( or perhaps even direct ) participant in the probable flare up between China and US allies/partners in South China sea and East China sea in the foreseeable future. Venezuela’s interest in the post Maduro period will be to rebuild the nation and spring back to prosperity with international assistance or with US assistance . US will do everything possible to reinforce its role in Venezuela with the help of Venezuelan Govt. US may also try to apply similar model in other South American countries depending on the success in Venezuela.
1.Introduction
While oil-interest and control of drug-trafficking are presented as the main reasons for the US attack on Venezuela , the real reasons could be strategic for the implementation of the National Security Strategy signed by President Trump in November 2025. Admiral Holsey , former Commander of Southern Command of USA had given a presentation to the US Congress on the need to have a new policy towards South American Countries for persuading them to come out of the influence of extra-Hemisphere countries like China, Russia and Iran . He had made particular reference to Venezuela , Nicaragua and Bolivia . We have to analyse the logic of the recent US military action in Venezuela taking into account all these aspects .
2.Oil-interest
Data released by US Energy Dept shows that
- US consumption of oil is slightly less than its production in 2024 . US production is around 22 million barrels per day (around 22 % of the global production )
- Venezuela’s total production of oil is around 950000 barrels per day ( less than 1 percent of the total global production of oil )
- Venezuela’s major export destination of oil in 2025 is China . ( US used to be a major client till sanctions were imposed )
Note : Oil-production in barrels include liquified natural gas but does not include gas transported through pipelines
It is true that Venezuela has huge deposits of oil ( around 330 billion barrels ) and US oil companies could have interest in exploiting these reserves on a medium-term and long-term basis . In fact , their own installations lying idle without proper maintenance could be revived partly if the ownership issues could be sorted out with the Venezuelan Govt. When US oil companies were operating in Venezuela , the oil-production was around 3.5 million barrels per day. Contrary to the UNFCCC position , USA bets high on oil and gas ( I think US may be pragmatic ) and hence US interest in oil could be strategic . In spite of all the discussions in UNFCCC for bringing down the consumption of fossil fuel , the oil production has gone up from 94.4 million barrels per day in 2015 ( year of Paris agreement ) to 102 million barrels per day in 2025 .
2.Drug-trafficking
While Venezuela is a transit-point for cocaine , it is not a producer of cocaine . Colombia , Peru and Bolivia are the biggest producers of cocaine in the region . In the normal course , USA could have targeted these countries for massive destruction of coca cultivation . Instead USA presumably chose Venezuela for punitive actions. While UN and several countries have raised their concern over US attack on Venezuela , USA will pay no heed claiming that such action is in conformity with its sacrosanct definition of national security .
- US National Security Strategy
This analysis leads me to the conclusion that the real reasons of US attack could be different . In my view , it is the first step for implementation of the US National Security Strategy in Western Hemisphere. According to US definition , Western Hemisphere includes Canada, the United States, Mexico, all the countries located in South America, beneficiary countries (as defined by section 2702 ) , the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the United States Virgin Islands. USA wants to have control over these countries for promoting US strategic interests . US considers the situation in many of these counties as alarming with the increased influence of China in trade and in BRI projects and the first step will be to decouple Venezuelan economy from Chinese influence. It is estimated that around 400000 Chinese live in Venezuela in 2025 . There are also around 600 Russians and 100 Iranians living in Venezuela for rendering help to run the oil installations . According to unconfirmed sources even Hamas and Hezbollah have camps in Venezuela .
US feels that this action will give a warning signal to other countries in South America. Simultaneously, the US State dept is engaged in a dialogue ( overt and covert ) with these countries for making them toe the US line.
- China’s influence in South America
China has been building its influence in South America through trade and investment during the last 10 years . China has made massive investments in the region through its BRI projects, infrastructure lending and Foreign Direct investments in energy and communication . China is also cooperating with these countries in space sector as well as in the manufacture of military equipment . China has expanded its cultural, diplomatic, and military presence throughout the region. China’s bilateral trade with countries like Brazil, Peru, Chile , Bolivia and Venezuela has been increasing substantially with positive trade balance for the South American countries ( Venezuela had a small deficit in 2024 ) . The Chancay port commissioned in Peru in 2024 with Chinese assistance will be a pivot for increasing Chinese exports to South American Countries . China is planning to stock manufactured goods in the godowns in Chancay port for supplying to all other countries with short delivery period . In May 2025, President Xi Jinping announced a $9.2 billion credit line to Latin American and Caribbean nations for development projects . China’s strategy is to increase import of agricultural products ( soyabean , corn , meat etc ) and metals and minerals from South America and export manufactured products to South America for creating a win-win situation . According to data released by China, the trade between China and the Latin America and Caribbean region ( LAC ) was 485 billion $ in 2022 ( China’s exports – 251 billion $, China’s imports – 234 billion $ ) . China is leveraging the economic relations with South American countries for building strategic relations for becoming an influential player in the region . USA has not been building good relations with these countries for multiple reasons . In 2024, USA had an export of 45.5 billion to South American and Central American Countries and an import of 159 billion $ . In essence , USA is getting worried about the increased Chinese presence in its vicinity and would like to deal with South American nations with a carrot and stick policy for making the situation favourable to it .
- How will Venezuela spring back to prosperity ?
It is for the Venezuelan people to make the choice and initiate appropriate actions making huge sacrifices . The first step will be to stabilize the political situation by nominating Edmondo Gonzales who is said to have won the last election or an interim president till a newly elected president takes charge. In any case , the new leader should be in a position to unite the Venezuelans in this hour of crisis without wasting time for witch-hunt . Venezuela is suffering from hyper-inflation year after year and the loss of value of money is affecting vast majority of the population . Retired people with pension have practically no income because of the loss of purchasing power . Ordinary citizens are not able to have essential commodities required for day to day life . Venezuela has a population of around 31 million with a median age of around 30 years. People are looking for opportunities for achieving prosperity through wealth-creation and its distribution . 8 million Venezuelans have left the country temporarily and it will be necessary to create the conditions favourable for their return .
The overall objectives for Venezuela could be to
- Revive the activities of the nationalized petroleum company PDVSA with fresh injection of funds along with freezing of past liabilities with a rescheduling of repayment through negotiations with creditors , debenture- holders and banks . I suppose that bonds issued by PDVSA are debentures without asset- backing . Still there could be litigations . Recapitalization of existing shares to represent its real value will be needed before injection of further equity . In this process , the existing shareholders will lose value considerably for the time being . It is also possible that state organizations with good cashflow may be asked to buy shares at the revalued price . If PDVSA performs well, these organizations will make good profit,
- Increase the oil-output to around 3.5 billion barrels per day which was achieved years ago targeting export of around 3 billion barrels per day leaving the rest for domestic consumption. This could add around 50 billion $ to the present GDP which is around 83 billion $ in 2025 ( IMF estimate ) .
- Revive the oil economy by selling part of PDVSA assets in parcels without liabilities to private investors . Open new oil wells as quickly as possible in private sector . .
- Since there has not been any major investment for infrastructure during the last two decades , it is necessary to mobilize resources from international organizations for building essential infrastructure .
- Bring down inflation drastically
- Reactivate the agricultural economy . Farm output has been falling year after year for multiple reasons resulting in import of some of the products . There is a need to correct the situation through policy directions .
- Reactivate the metals and minerals economy . This is under state sector . It will be good to explore the possibilities to promote private investment through joint ventures . In fact , it will be possible to give majority holdings to private sector with the state holding a certain percentage of shares with minority-blocking-rights .
In my view , Venezuela has two options
- To establish an independent democratically elected govt with rule of law and institutional check and balance for bringing Venezuela back to prosperity with international assistance
- Bring back political stability and draw support from USA for bringing Venezuela back to prosperity with the risk of being vassal state of USA
It is for the Venezuelan people to make the right choice at this crucial juncture with calculated risk without being overtaken by emotion .
- Will USA be able to win over the South American Countries ?
US attempts to influence South American countries with free market capitalism and neo-liberalism in economic policies did not find much success so far and US will have to be more pragmatic in its approach with these countries which have embraced socialism . While a certain section of the middle-class in these countries do appreciate US capitalism , the vast majority of the population is for a socialistic pattern of society for countering neo-liberalism . Increasing influence of China in these countries is a matter of concern for USA from a national security point of view . US Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio has initiated a new move to persuade these countries to go slow with their strategic relations with China by offering better conditions from USA or its allies. Will it work ? . There will be several hurdles. However , Venezuela could be a successful model if US could help a democratically elected Govt to achieve political stability with rule of law, economic revival with management of inflation, availability of essential commodities in the market and adequate purchasing power for all. Simultaneously conditions should be created for reactivating oil industry with the participation of US companies . Repeal of sanctions by US Govt and repeal of oil laws by Venezuelan Govt will be essential for the revival . A successful model in Venezuela will help USA to replicate such a model in some of the South American Countries .
- Conclusion
6.1. The US action in Venezuela could be considered by many nations as violation of international laws. However , US will continue to insist that the action was undertaken to protect US national interest .
6.2. Venezuelan economy is in deep crisis and Venezuelans need a pragmatic solution to tide over the situation by reviving its oil industry and mining/metals industry . It could be through international assistance or through US assistance
6.3. US action in Venezuela appears to be for protecting US national interests from the influence of extra-Western- hemisphere actors.
6.4. USA is greatly concerned about the increasing influence of China in South American countries through its BRI projects and export of cheap Chinese products . US considers it as a risk to its national security and is planning to initiate a new strategy for win over most of these South American nations to its side . It will be a very difficult task.







Good analysis . Though controversial , I personally feel aligned with the views of the author .
Whether world likes it or not , whether domestic Democrates and left liberals like it or not , MAGA team has demonstrated in Gaza, Iran, Qatar, and Venezuela recently what they mean by “peace through strength.”
It sends a clear message to world leaders and the woke, left, radical community of America , Europe and world , that Trump means business—not just slogans and rhetoric.
By his unorthodox , outrageous actions, Trump is sending unequivocal signals to his critiques , and those who ridicule and dismiss him as a clown, to take him seriously when he asks them for any thing .
He is meticulously creating an image that the world must pause and listen, when America speaks.
By doing this the message he is conveying to to the world that under him , not to take America lightly—America is no longer the America of Obama, Biden, and Harris.
America now wields the stick and is prepared to strike and not bothered to take any amount of criticism for it.
It is willing to extract a cost from those who plan, plot, conspire, and fund activities aimed at harming America, thinking it is a declining or dying power that can be taken for a ride.
MAGA is trying to put America on top again, not by bending, appeasing, pleading, preaching, or being a goody-goody boy, but as a tough actor who knows how to rein in global destabilizing and damaging forces going astray worldwide.
International laws were already flagrantly violated and thrown to the winds when most world leaders sided with terrorists and rewarded their heinous crimes against humanity, and when the world stood with brutal murderous regimes and worst human rights violators, when the UN under their influence lost its neutrality and started ganging up, acting as a syndicate of terrorists and criminals to aid, abet, and fuel instability and chaos in the garb of vague, dubious, unjust, partisan, utopian, unrealistic principles.
The rule of law in international affairs lost its relevance when bodies like the UN started seating worst human rights violators and terror sponsors in security councils, human rights watch bodies, UNRWA, and ICJ.
“Universal rule of law” lost its relevance when October 7 was cheered and celebrated in the UN General Assembly and the Secretary General attempted to justify the heinous crimes of Oct. 7 by putting them in “context.”
“Universal rule of law” lost its credibility and relevance when the right to self-defense of a tiny country attacked simultaneously from seven fronts was Questioned and trivialised by the majority of UN members .
“Universal rule of law” lost its credibility and relevance when UN gave respectability and legitimacy to the rogue leaders of countries like Iran, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Turkey, Lebanon, Hamas, Hezbollah , PA who overtly or covertly , have not hesitated to declare ( even in UN) that obliteration of the only Jewish state on earth i.e. Israel, is their national objective, national priority and primary principle of their foreign policy .
“Universal rule of law” lost its credibility and relevance when UN gave respectability and legitimacy to the rogue leaders who openly want to destroy and wipe out a sovereign democracy and a member state from the surface of the earth.
“Universal rule of law” lost its credibility and relevance when UN gave respectability and legitimacy to the rogue leaders who openly advocated and promoted ideologies that wanted to genocide its 9.2 million citizens of Israel and jews .
“Universal international rule of law” also lost its credibility and relevance when UN gave respectability and legitimacy to majority UN members who questioned the right of Israel to defend itself , commensurate to its own assessment of its security needs from its genocidal enemies ,
UN and international law , as far as America and Israel are concerned , lost its credibility when it decided to treat American supported Israeli defence and retaliation of October 7, as its act of aggression against these rogue nations and entities .
Little that the fake hypocritical moral brigade of the world understand that MAGA de-facto is re-establishing the international rule of law in International conduct – a world order in which no one who calls for death to America , no one who calls for destruction of western civilisation and free world is let go escort free .
When any rogue leader like members of the anti America , anti west, anti free world axis of evil , like Maduro and Ayatollah or Muslim brotherhood leaders call death to America , they should know America is coming for them .